Just another WordPress.com site

Month: May, 2012

Twin Brown Dwarfs!

Recently astronomers have declared that a great number of planets are free moving between the stars. These bodies do not orbit any star that we know of. This leads to the disturbing possibility that one of these rogue planets could be attracted by the Sun’s gravity.

This rogue planet might have already happened. Venus is a likely candidate for such a rogue planet coming into our Solar System some unknown time in our past. Which would mean it heated up after it obtained a stable orbit around our Sun. The evidence is clear. The planet rotates the opposite way from every planet in the Solar System. The rotation is longer than a year on Venus. One day is 268 of our days long. The rotation of Venus around the Sun is 222 days long.

This subject of Venus was brought up by a Russian Scientist. His qualifications were not in Astronomy. He was actually a Psychologist with a minor in ancient languages. His Psychologist specialty was national psychology. He maintained that we were all suffering from a form of group amnesia brought on by a near collision with Venus in ancient times. His original book called “When Worlds Collide” caused quite a reaction amongst astronomers who maintained that Venus was Earth-like until Russian probes found it to be quite hot and hellish in nature. Immanuel Velinkovski(never can remember the spelling on this scientist so I probably have it wrong again) was entirely right. The astronomers were wrong.

Other circumstantial evidence exists. The planet Venus has an extremely thick atmosphere. 15 times thicker than the one around the Earth. The planet is very hot. Venus is much hotter than can be accounted for with its closer orbit around the Sun.

I suggest that not only planets are free floating out there. To me at least this is very scary. We have no idea what is floating out there in the ocean of space.

The most likely candidate for free floating objects are Brown Dwarfs. This subject has been approached very well by Andy Lloyd in his book The Dark Star. He suggests a star approximately 2 to 10 times the size of Jupiter in a comet like orbit. He suggests an orbit 45 to 53 degrees out of sync with the rest of the solar system. It is orbiting about 2 light years out right now. Probably coming into the system every 3800 years. It has 6 or 7 planets rotating around it. No one has any information on what the planets look like.

My own thought is we have two brown dwarfs orbiting each other out there. The one dwarf is young. The other has broken up into planets. It is still hot but relatively cold as stars go. I think it is a remnant water world. The atmosphere would probably be maintained by volcanic activity. It could be several times that of the Earth. It could be many times heavier than the Earth. If it has broken up like I think it has, then the remnants are probably much smaller than a dwarf at this point in time. Based on what I have read, I suspect it has an Earth-like atmosphere and an Earth-like gravity. I suggest it is probably around 130%-150% Earth normal. Meaning for every 100 pounds we weigh here, we would weigh 30 to 50 pounds more on that dwarf remnant. I suggest the surface is cooled by water and is thin like the Earth’s surface is.

There is the possibility that the other planets are really moons of the major planet. There is also a possibility that it has a large moon like the Earth has. If it has broken up that increases the likelihood of a Earth sized planet with an Earth sized moon.

I think the atmosphere compensates for the increased gravity. It is likely that a water based life form might be dominate. Yes, life might have evolved there and seeded to our planet in the remote past.

The entire spectrum would probably be designed around the infrared instead of the one we have here on Earth. I suspect most of the radiation from the remaining star would be in the infrared range.

So if the life on this planet originated there, we would have compatible genetic material. I suggest also the higher gravity might produce a species with denser bones. Probably one slightly larger than us. If their visual range extends well into the infrared, it would give them a form of x-ray vision. Clothes would be semi-transparent to these creatures.

Everything I have said so far is based on guess work. The problem with Earth is we are too close to the Sun. The atmosphere does not protect us well enough from the radiation. This leads to people dying within 100 years of being born. Aging is at least partially a disease of radiation poisoning. The other part appears to be genetic. There is an actual clock built into our cells that runs down in time.

I mention this because the natives of this planet probably have much longer lifespans than we do. The problem with coming here would be it would shorten their lifespans considerably. They would still live many times what we do. But the lighter gravity, the radiation from the Sun, the thinner atmosphere would all contribute to shortened longevity for their people living here.

Even only coming out at night, would not help much. The entire planet is saturated with radiation from the Sun.

Again everything in this article is guesswork. If this proposed life form exists and is intelligent, it is extremely likely they have overcome the radiation problem.

What would we be capable of if we had extremely long lives? If we had technology even 10,000 years beyond what we currently have? There is probably nothing that would be beyond our abilities to do.

I can hear it now .  . . Enoch called. God wants his slaves back!



Evolution and the Great Dividing Line

While I have been a fan of the evolution theory over the years, the fact is it is a theory and nothing more or less. It has never been conclusively proven. Thus the missing Link(s) that are never found.

I suggest that the missing links are not there. They are not there because we skipped those stages.

When I was growing up in High School we were taught that our species had 48 chromosomes. That was the same number as the entire ape family from which we came.

Then it was discovered we actually have two chromosomes that are unlike any other species on the planet. The two chromosomes are double the size of any others. They are matching chromosomes on both sides of the genetic material in the cells and reproduce that way.

Suddenly, we appear to have two less chromosomes than the rest of the ape family. So our species actually have 46 chromosomes instead of 48.

The fact is those two double-sized chromosomes put a monkey wrench(forgive the pun) in the entire evolution theory for mankind. It could be speculated that those two chromosomes are what make us the dominant species on the planet.

It could also be speculated that somewhere down the evolutionary path our ancestors were altered in such a way as to advance our evolution by millions of years. The question that takes this out of the realm of serious study is what or how did those two chromosomes come to be.

So the entire scientific community does its serious best to ignore the evidence. To do otherwise, they would have to acknowledge the possibility of a species capable of altering ours from some advanced technological group or even some alien life form similar to our own.

The implications of such facts would be totally unacceptable under the current leadership of our scientific community. To imply aliens would make them a laughing stock amongst their piers.

Yet that is what the double chromosomes actually leads to. Something changed us.

If these aliens exist, we have another problem. It means a common thread of chromosomes and genes exist other than our own planet. It means a common ancestor between us that allows breeding stock.

When you have a difference in chromosome numbers between male and female, you generally get something called a mule. The Mule is highly superior in intelligence to either a horse or a donkey. The other thing is Mules are almost always sterile. If a second generation Mule does exist, it is sterile.

There is other evidence. Birth is difficult for our females because of the size of the head of the babies. The birth canal is usually too small. This means a large number of deaths in a non-technical, non-medical, society. We appear to have more genetic defects than any other species on the planet. That is also an indicator of genetic manipulation.

We have an uncommonly long lifespan for this planet. 75-125 years is not unusual. Only a few species have longer lifespans than our own on the planet. (I feel that the clock was reset at some point so that we had a shorter lifespan. I think the original clock in the cells might have been set to 900 years or more. I think we reproduced to fast. But that is another story.) When did the shift towards shorter lifespans occur?

I propose that we figure out when the current genetic setup occurred. When did the abnormal chromosomes first occur? I have heard figures of around 200,000 BC as a starting point. Did Neanderthal man have 48 or 46 chromosomes? What was the average lifespan of a Neanderthal barring accidents? Was it longer or shorter than our lifespans?

I think the dividing line between 48 and 46 chromosomes is where the evolutionary theory comes crashing down. If an alteration occurred, then anyone mating with a 46 chromosome human would likely have mules. The second generation would not occur. That is a likely explanation for the doom of other human species on our planet. Yes they could capture our females. Yes they could successfully mate with them. All the offspring would have been sterile. The offspring would likely be stronger and more intelligent than either species. The problem being it is a dead end for reproduction. Being stronger they probably would have monopolized the existing females in the tribes. No second generation occurred with the mixed species types.



That is why I think the missing links are missing.

The other implication has profound problems. We are implying life forms from somewhere that are compatible with our own. They can eat our foods without problems. They can use their women as possible breeding stock to produce this mutated species we call our own. If the legends and myths of numerous peoples all over the planet are true, they made us to look like them. The other question is how many chromosomes did this species have? Did they succumb to the Mule effect when cross breeding with us? Just how close to identical did they make us to them?

If they are a compatible life form with Earth life, it implies that we may have a common origin with them at some point in the past.

All of this is really colorful. Too colorful for a bland scientific community still in the dark ages of believing we are the center of everything on a flat earth. To think otherwise is heresy. Far worse, it is to cut the purse strings of whomever would go outside the box with theories that do not fit the norm. I refer to the flat earth norm that is most comfortable for most people in the scientific community.







Religion and politics . . .

Recently the issue of religion has come up in regards to Mr. Romney’s pursuit of becoming President of the United States. He is a Mormon.

I think this criticism is off base. The Mormon faith is an established religion practiced by millions of people throughout the United States. It is not a cult. It is not anything more or less than an established faith in this country. The belief system is relatively young. It’s original practice of multiple wives was considered bad by a lot of Christian faiths in this country. Utah was out in the middle of no where land when the Mormons established themselves. Our country grew around them. To this day, there are Mormons with more than one wife in the western part of this country.

Now consider the Muslim faith as practiced by a good portion of the world in the middle east. By their faith, four wives is the limit. If a Muslim took up residence in this country would he be subject to one wife laws in our states? I do not think so. I think he would be grandfathered in. Or would he have to split his multiple wife family apart? That is just cruel.

In some areas of the world different ethics and different morales apply. For instance in the South Pacific in countries where it is very hot and no air conditioning I am sure nudity is practiced. It is not acceptable here under restrictive Christian beliefs. There are a whole lot of laws based on Christian general beliefs. They do not apply on a world wide basis. Just like their laws in the middle east might not apply here, our laws do not apply there.

I think we need to look at what a person stands for politically rather than his religious personal life. His religious beliefs are between him and his God. I respect his right to practice his religion. I want his abilities to be the determining factor as to whether he is qualified to be our next President. What does he stand for? What is his voting record look like and how does it compare to what he is saying in his campaign? Is he caught in any apparent lies comparing the two?

What are his ideas on current issues such as Social Security, Medicare, and economic issues? What about constitutional issues? More and more we see in the name of Ecology, security and other ideals that the bill of rights is being ignored. I want an executive in there that will change that. I want our rights under the constitution reinstated.

Under his previous republican President Bush, a lot of today’s problems came from a Republican. That was a grammatical nightmare . . . Such as solving a budget problem with an executive order limiting my health benefits with the VA to a communistic limit on income. If you were successful in life, your benefits disappeared. I don’t believe in rewarding hard work and income with dissolving my hard earned benefits with the VA. There has to be a better way.

I do not believe in giving people things that other people have to earn by hard work. I think we need an entirely different approach to welfare. I want to return to a system in which hard work is rewarded not penalized. I want to do away with investment accounts like 401K used INSTEAD OF decent retirement pensions. If it is in addition to a decent pension then it is all right.

I want to bring back decent wages. That means we have to have a system of negotiation with companies that is balanced. Unions were an answer in the past. The government broke the Unions back in the 80s under Reagan. Most of your employment problems stem from that breaking the power of Unions in the workplace. They are still printing money with nothing to back it up. But people do not have the ability to negotiate wages on their own. So inflation is eating the average person alive. That needs to be addressed.

Our goofy legislatures have taken the profit out of owning a private residence. The tax laws have gradually made a joke out of owning a home for a tax deduction. What they failed to realize was there is an entire nation of cities dependent on tax revenues from the ownership of private homes. The mortgage industry depends on tax deductions. Otherwise the criminal interest of 95/5% on a starting mortgage makes no sense economically. That is 95 percent interest and 5 percent into principal. It is at least 7 or 8 years before you start paying off a house under the terms of these contracts.

No wonder the entire industry has gone bankrupt. What part of benefits to the homeowners isn’t understood by government legislatures? That is why people walk away from houses leaving the bank stuck. I say give the homeowner unemployment insurance. I mean suspend the mortgage until they can get on their feet instead of foreclosing the homes. Give them a chance to put it on the market and sell it instead of losing everything they have ever worked for.

Your banks are down the tubes because of an old fashioned foreclosure policy. Fraud was involved in giving out a lot of these mortgages to people not qualified to pay a mortgage long term. It had something to do with clouding the issues with racism and poverty. They were not afraid to issue mortgages to poor people who could not keep them up. That was fraud.

Some of those people did this with full knowledge of wrong doing. They belong in jail.

I want a President with the guts to put them there. I want a President with guts, period.

I want a change in international policy. I want our currency competitive. I want our corporations here not there. If they leave, it is because we are not economical compared with elsewhere. I don’t understand a lot of that. I am a commercial transportation specialist from my service days. It has to cost money transport goods across the world. That makes them uncompetitive price wise with local goods unless it is artificially supported by a government in violation of treaties and artificially low currency exchanges. That has to change.

In the old days, we had taxes on anything imported into this country to protect our industry. That is unfashionable now. But it worked. I want a President with the guts to change that back so our industry comes first in this country.

I want the dependence on foreign goods to stop. I want a lot of things. The new President has to say no where no is in our best interests. The new man must change a lot of things and make them solvent economically.

We have to get out of involving ourselves in foreign wars. It is bankrupting us. We have to get out of the business of policing the world. It is not economically feasible.

China declared economic war on the world 30-40 years ago. It is time to respond and change that. The new man better get it together or he will be unelected at the very next opportunity.

I would like to see a complete new tax system that is better suited to our current world. We have a saying in the computer industry. KISS! Keep It Simple Stupid! Well we need a simplified tax system that is both fair and not excessive. WE need to fire the IRS and start over. I want to see a document with a tax system that is self-substaining and so simple I can explain it to a 7 year old.

I want a system that guarantees us the businesses wanting to live here. That means drastic changes.

I want a system where a man’s beliefs in God do not enter into the political situation. I want a system where only the man’s results are counted.








What is in a name? A thief is a thief is a thief . ..

I recently read in Mercola.com about a farmer. His money was seized by the government under phony charges.

Now the government wants to keep their money even though the family was found innocent of any wrong doing.

The Mafia would be proud of their son the Government. A thief by any other name is still a thief. Obviously the government has become a thief. They have abandoned even the appearance of justice in the court system.

This reminds me of the dealings of the Interior Department with the American Indians. They apparently have embezzeled large sums of money over the years from this group of people.

Now they are going after poor hard working farmers? The lesson here appears to be that if we are guilty of hard work we will be penalised by these parasites.

Perhaps it is time to reconsider keeping the people in this government employed. I suggest that the bureau that is responsible for this action be fired.




My nightmare about the future . . .

We are going to see a currency collapse. The President (Obama or his successor) will have to declare a bank holiday of about two weeks.

The President will take charge of all resources of the American people in the name of this bankruptcy of the entire nation. (Executive orders are all ready in place to do this.)

He will dole out those resources based on political favorability. Eventually he will be forced to issue ration books to everyone and dole it out equally to everyone so no one starves.

I expect riots. So does he. The military will be called in and an emergency declared. Martial Law will be declared for the entire country.

Prisons have already been built to hold the rioters. Just no one is certain how widespread it will be. If it is too widespread you will see tanks and guns on the streets to restrain the rioting public. All stores will be closed until further notice until this is a military government making all the rules.

All debts under the President’s dictatorship will be forgiven. Everyone will be starting over. Thus the student loans will be forgiven like everything else. The big losers here will be the money lenders as they will not be able to collect anything from anyone.

All money will be turned in to the government. The new money will be a credit card issued to everyone. Instead of money, you will present the credit card at the stores. Money as we know it in wallets and purses will be illegal in the future. I don’t know what is going to be done with savings accounts.

Gold, Silver, platinum, and jewelry will be confiscated by the US government and credit will be given in its place. I suspect any money in the bank will be confiscated.

I look to see the biggest and best theft of wealth this country has ever seen in the name of Martial Law and emergency powers of government.

This is not the only place that this will be tried. I suggest all of Europe will see it happen overnight.

This leaves countries like Panama, Argentina, Brazil, and others on a short stick. But they will be free for the time being because the governments will be busy eating up what they have taken. Besides it is easier to export the trouble makers somewhere than to kill them.

The new dollar will be a credit currency. It will have no substantial backing except the worldly goods of the countries involved. In the past Korea had a currency crisis like this in the 60s. The equivalent of a dollar became a dime in the new currency exchange. The dime became a penny. The penny was worthless paper. I feel that something along that line will happen here. Only it will be on paper in the computers at the banks, not in anyone’s pockets. That is why the issue of a credit type card is where I think they will go with this.

Welcome to my worst nightmare. The facts out there are available to anyone that wants to look. Jessy Helms, The American Dream, Lew Rockwell authors, It is there if you want to see it.

I guess the only real unknown is “when” . . . I think the first sign will be a general collapse of the stock market back to around 5,000 from 13,000. That is when the bank holiday will have to occur.

Let us hope that I am completely wrong and some other solution happens instead.

I think the government has gone too far on dishwashing detergents . . .

The government has gone too far.

They have taken Finish Glass Magic off the shelves.

Now we all get to suffer cloudy dirty drinking glasses or else ! ! !

The problem is environmental government. It has evolved to the point where our national government is no longer making decisions. It is being made by treaty with the United Nations.

In the next few years, I think we are going to see a problem much larger than a few dirty dishes.

The problem is government on an international scale as produced by the Environmental agency of the United Nations.

We have seen these people remove products from the market before. Our own belief systems concerning supplements vs prescriptions is a good example.

I personally feel we need to take executive orders out of the jurisdiction of the President. The President should not be making law on his own. That is the job of our Congress not the President. Yes, he can veto laws. That is written right in the game book better known as our Constitution.

Somewhere, it evolved that the President could initiate wars. That is Congress’s jurisdiction. I think it occurred in the Kennedy administration.

Somewhere, it evolved that a President could give executive orders changing the rights of American citizens. That is dictatorship as forbidden by our constitution. Bush used this to alter benefits Veterans got under the veteran’s health care. He made it communistic when your income determined your right to benefits. The current administration has continued those executive orders contrary to the Constitution. I don’t remember those rules being in effect when we were being shot at on foreign soils. Most of the people I lived with in Air Force Barracks at Niagara Falls, NY died in that Vietnam War of the time.

Vote for Tweedledee or Tweedledum. They are both two sides of the same administration with the same ideas of government. Only minor differences between the two candidates for President.

What needs to change here is the monopoly of the two party system. When it doesn’t work we need new ideas that do work. The idea behind the system was to provide those ideas with opposing political agendas. This is no longer working. Both parties seem to be bought and paid for and have been for many years.

I suggest we change Presidents. This one has a license to kill literally because he is a President that does not have to concern himself with re-election after this term. He has 4 years to do anything he wants to. The other guy has 8 years to worry about. So he has to come up with something to get him re-elected in four years.

Concerning the environment, the studies on phosphorus do not favor the EPA decisions. The type of phosphorus in dish washing detergent apparently is not broken down by algae like phosphorus in fertilizers. So the entire farce is government and money not EPA stuff at all.

I say lots of luck changing it. The government does not care to take on the ridiculous EPA bureaucrats.

The EPA is bureaucratic rule at its finest. It would take 3 semi trucks to get a copy of all the rules Congress has allotted to the EPA agency. I hear that many of those laws contradict each other. So the EPA rulers get to choose what they actually enforce.

I think the entire EPA needs to be cleaned up. It needs to be fired. Then we need to sit down and figure out what laws contradict each other. Cancel both laws out. Then we need some common sense laws that do not kill our economy in the name of Environmental Protection. There has to be a way for both business and a respect for the environment can get along peacefully.

I think the first thing we need to do is get sound science behind any decision made by the agency. Then we need to get it approved by a Congressional body.

I think we need to go back to being a country that follows the Constitution. I think we need a new Supreme Court that follows the Constitution. Lots of luck with that idea.